RACC Blog

Black Life Experiential Research Group Pursuing Change Through Art and Radical Geography

by Bruce Poinsette

 

(This is the second of two articles about artist-in-residence projects that RACC manages through the Percent for Public Art Program for the City of Portland.)

Spend a few minutes with Dr. Lisa Bates and Sharita Towne and the two women will have you questioning everything you’ve ever learned about the role of Black creativity in America. For the transdisciplinary artist and urban planner duo, the Black imagination is a tool for tangible change that they’re putting into action through their collaboration as the Black Life Experiential Research Group.

“The Black imagination isn’t about distraction,” says Towne. “We’re not using it to distract us from our reality. Our imagination is an underground railroad of meanings that is actually about derailing oppression. It’s in our imagination that we find a means of escape.”

Officially described as an “interdisciplinary collaborative for inquiry and activism at the intersection of art, urban planning, and radical geography,” BLERG is a think tank that Towne and Bates began developing in the spring of 2017. With the support of the Regional Arts & Culture Council, BLERG is currently participating in an artist-in-residence program focused on the Humboldt neighborhood. Utilizing a variety of different artistic mediums, collaborators, and spaces, the project seeks to both build community and redefine the narrative around Black life in Portland. BLERG-related projects include a DIY newspaper called the “Black Life Sentinel,” collaborative events with local Black artists such as “This is a Black Spatial Imaginary,” ongoing oral history interviews with longtime residents of the Humboldt neighborhood and community, and collaborative learning experiences with students at Jefferson High School.

Towne and Bates are keenly aware that the term “think tank” evokes thoughts of a disconnected, sterilized approach. Bates specifically references the work of geographer Clive Woods when she notes that statistics and metrics like the “achievement gap” and measurements of “blight” have long been used to dehumanize Black communities. Yet, instead of running away from these analytical tools, she and Towne are working to repurpose them to serve Black Portlanders. 

“He (Woods) asked the question, ‘Are we academic coroners? Is this just an autopsy over and over again?’ And then he turns and asks, ‘Isn’t it the same scalpel in the hands of a coroner that’s in the hands of a surgeon?,’” recalls Bates. “So how can we take these tools, instruments, and ways that we study and think and wield them with a different intention?

“How do you talk about struggle and oppression, but also talk about resilience and joy? How do we talk about how Black life continues in those conditions?”

Towne adds, “When Black people get together, be it across discipline or geographies, something shakes loose inside of us. New possibilities are born out of that. With a think tank, we’re not just interested in producing a dry, analytical report. We’re interested in producing an experience that is just as much ours as it is the people who end up collaborating with us to make it or the people who witness it and carry it forward in whatever work they might do that benefits Black life.”

In many ways, Towne and Bates’ vision for BLERG is informed by their past experiences in the areas of art, activism, and urban planning. Towne is transdisciplinary artist and educator who has spent significant time not just in Portland, but also Salem, Tacoma, and Sacramento. She has won a host of awards and produced a number of exhibitions throughout the country. Some of her recent local projects include the film workshop De-Gentrifying Portland and Our City in Stereo exhibition.

Bates, meanwhile, is professional urban planner and activist scholar. Like Towne, Bates has won awards for her work, which has included research stints not just in Portland, but post-Katrina New Orleans and Chicago. She has worked with a multitude of public agencies in Portland to develop equity plans and strategies, including previously serving on the board of directors for the Portland Housing Center.

Considering Bates and Towne’s mutual interest in exploring the roots of gentrification and studying Black space, it was only a matter of time before their paths crossed at the Portland City Club a little over a year prior to the creation of BLERG. After hitting it off, the two quickly developed a vision for a project. Among other things, one of their primary goals was to pivot the larger cultural narrative from Black Lives Matter to “Black Life Matters.” Specifically, they wanted to move away from just discussing the Black experience within the narrow prisms of racial oppression and state-sponsored violence, and instead focus on the entirety of what it means to be Black in Portland. For Bates and Towne, this meant celebrating Black life as an everyday experience and discussing historical Black places as a matter of geography.

Black Life Sentinel Issue One

Black Life Sentinel Issue One

One example of how this ideal manifests in their work is the “Black Life Sentinel.” The DIY newspaper, which is a collaboration with the Portland African American Leadership Forum, Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods, and the Regional Arts & Culture Council, dedicates each issue to a specific subject of concern for Portland’s Black community. In the latest edition, the paper took on urban renewal. Specifically, the theme of the issue, as well as the title of an editorial by Bates and Towne, was “Is more urban renewal what North/Northeast Portland needs?” In addition to the editorial, the paper contains both current and historic pictures of North/Northeast Portland’s Black community, interviews and testimonials from Black residents, a copy of PAALF’s vision for valuing Black lives, a glossary of urban renewal-related terms, and even a copy of a press release and separate document from the City of Portland making the case for urban renewal.

With the assistance of PAALF, Towne and Bates distribute the papers through word of mouth. Bates says she was genuinely surprised to find out how many people were unaware that the City was considering expanding its urban renewal efforts. For her, it signaled a clear deficit in media coverage.

“Where is this being reported or talked about at?,” says Bates. “Is it not being framed or connected in away that makes sense to people? What happened here? Me, being in urban planning and being attuned to the urban renewal area here, I knew all about that. I just thought everybody knew about it because it’s a big deal and it’s this super historically significant site. And then I started talking to people and handing them papers, and they knew nothing about it.”

While she was surprised by the collective lack of knowledge about current urban renewal plans, Bates understands that the subject in general isn’t particularly accessible for most people. In addition to being considered “boring,” she says it is often depressing. Specifically, the constant research on exclusion, exploitation, displacement, and predatory lending weighs on her.

“It’s just all of these layers upon layers of ways that policy and planning and urban renewal have defined Black people and spaces with Black people in them as defective and unacceptable, then did things to those people to contain, remove, and acculturate them in some harsh way,” says Bates. “But it’s also extremely depressing and in some ways, a weird project for urban planning. Urban planning is inherently future looking. Urban planning is supposed to be about the 25 year plan.

“But what are the tools that would let us imagine a different future? All of the basic tools we have in planning just involve projecting forward from a baseline, assuming the baseline is okay. But if none of this is okay at all because we now understand where we came from, then what would be the thing? So you have to start getting into something that would be way more about the imagination and creative problem solving. It can’t just be learning how to do a population projection. It can’t just be the mainstream tools of real estate site analysis because that’s already got all the bad stuff baked into it.”

BLERG taps into the aforementioned creative problem solving in a variety of ways, including rethinking the very foundation of their approach. Perhaps the best example of this is their collaboration with Jefferson High School, which is part of a larger RACC-sponsored artist-in-residency in the Humboldt Neighborhood.

Black Life Sentinel Issue One

Inside Black Life Sentinel Issue One

For this portion of the project, Towne and Bates work with a Jefferson Senior Inquiry class that explores race and social justice. They visit the class anywhere from twice a month to twice a week. Unlike other courses that seek to engage students with local artists, they make a point of not going into the classroom with a set plan. Instead, they work with the teachers and participate in the activities the students are already doing. They also spend a lot of time simply listening and conversing with students to gauge their perspectives. Four months in, while they don’t have any set projects, a number of students have agreed to work with BLERG on oral history interviews with their family members. Others are currently working with Towne and Bates on gallery presentations set for this spring.

“It can sometimes feel meandering or time consuming for artists or people outside of the school,” says Towne. “At the same time, I think it’s important in a place like Jeff to not arrive with a formula that you want to plug them into as variables. I think Jeff is a high school that is often sensationalized in ways that those youth don’t need to be enduring in their high school experience and in the history of this neighborhood and community. We’re really interested in being there and seeing how we share inquiry and give each other life. That way, we can see what shakes loose out of the soundboarding of our shared stake in Black life in this place.”

Sarah Dougher, a local musician and Portland State University professor who helps teach Senior Inquiry at Jefferson, echoes Towne’s sentiments. She says she’s been particularly impressed with how Towne and Bates give students space and encouragement.

“One thing that is really meaningful for our students is when people come in and spend the time to get to know them and to develop relationships with them,” says Dougher. “Most of the time when an artist or writer comes in, students are put in a position to automatically like and trust what that person is doing. One thing that Sharita and Lisa do is understand that is actually not a given. Building relationships with students is part of what makes the learning happen. This means actually spending a lot of time in the classroom with us and doing what we’re doing.”

While the Jefferson collaboration doesn’t yet have a centralized project, one BLERG activity that Dougher says was especially impactful for her students was the “Curation Station” project. As part of this activity, Towne and Bates invited six artists of color representing a variety of different mediums to speak to students. The artists ranged from graphic designers to traditional museum curators. In the weeks following “Curation Station,” Jefferson students even chose one of the presenters to be the keynote speaker for their Black History Month Symposium.

Going forward, Dougher hopes the BLERG collaboration can serve as a model for expanding and developing similar projects at other schools. While she admits that between Jefferson, PSU, and BLERG, it requires an inordinate amount of planning and resources, she believes Towne and Bates’ deliberate, responsive approach is still very much worth the investment. Dougher believes this approach is especially important for introducing students to careers they may not otherwise engage with in a meaningful way.

“It sets up situations for students to interact with different kind of adults, particularly weird adults like artists,” says Dougher. “Most of the adults coming into a school setting are not like that.”

“For me, it’s not ‘Some young people of color saw a role model.’ That’s gross,” adds Bates. “It’s about someone seeing something that made them think about what they’re doing with their work in a different way.”

Black Life Sentinel Issue One

Inside Black Life Sentinel Issue One

In many ways, this undefined approach to working with Jefferson students is reflective of the BLERG project as a whole. By taking on a transdisciplinary approach that encompasses various artistic mediums, as well as community partners and spaces, Towne says it gives the project the advantage of being hard to contain.

“If I’m hitting something as hard and embedded as the white spatial imaginary of Portland and what it has done to generation after generation–if I’m hitting it with all these things in such a massive way, it creates these fissures that can be used in different ways to get to the meat of it and break it apart,” says Towne. “Whereas if it’s one particular angle, I find it’s very easy to get preoccupied with the medium or get preoccupied with the art. But when you use all these different things, it lifts us out of that. Then we can talk about the conceptual underpinning of what we’re dealing with rather than the cool video we saw.”

Going forward, Towne and Bates are working with a local library partner to host more programming that focuses on family and community history in the Humboldt neighborhood. As with all their other programming and activities, the ultimate goal is to create and expand opportunities for different members of Portland’s Black community to engage with each other. Despite the historic apprehension on the part of the City towards most Black organizing, Towne points out that the benefits of this engagement go far beyond the Black community.

“It’s out of that mutuality and solidarity of Black spaces that we see an emergence of the prescription to society’s problems,” says Towne. “As a Black Oregonian seeing and witnessing what that has meant to generation after generation of my family, the values we infuse into space and the way that we take care of people is something that really informs this project.

“When you look at North and Northeast Portland, you see the Black spatial imaginary also included Pacific Islanders. It included Vietnamese refugees. It included all of these people. And that’s what I think I’m interested in. I want people to realize that when we’re centering Blackness, it’s not to exclude anybody, ever. It’s just to acknowledge the way that our values have permeated into the landscape of this place and benefited a lot of people, even in moments of the most devastating segregatory policies of the 20th century.”

———————————————————–

¹The presentations will be held at PCC Paragon Gallery from Apr. 4-25.
²
Derrais (d.a.) Carter, Roshani Thakore, Melanie Stevens, Black Life Experiential Research Group (Sharita Towne and Lisa K. Bates), Kayela J, and Ashley Stull Meyers.
³
The Humboldt Neighborhood Artist-in-Residence project is a partnership between PCC Cascade, the City of Portland and RACC and made possible with funding from PCC Cascade and City Percent for Art funds from neighborhood street improvements. “It’s cool because it does allow for people to really get into the community and not just put up a tombstone that says, ‘They Black community was here,’” says committee member Donovan Smith. “It really allows them to dig in and find out what the community that’s here needs and reflect that back through different artistic avenues. I also like that they’re going through these different cycles so each artist has the chance to build off the work that came from the artist and residence before them.”


 

BRUCE POINSETTE  is a versatile freelance writer, copy/content editor, editorialist, and speaker. Poinsette versatile work ranges from content creation to speechwriting. He has authored over 100 articles in five Portland area publications, including The Skanner, The Oregonian, Street Roots, Flossin’ Media, and We Out Here Magazine;  in the collegiate curricula at Portland State University and University of Oregon. As a speaker, Poinsette has made presentations and participated in panels at various churches, K-12 schools, and universities. Poinsette has also conducted workshops on the journalistic interview. Find out more about Bruce and his work here.

 


Response: Jo Ann Hardesty

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.

Here are the responses provided by Jo Ann Hardesty, running for Portland City Council, position 3. All responses are reprinted verbatim.

 


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in Portland?

JAH: As chair of the Community Grants Committee for the East Portland Action plan I have advocated for funding support for:

  1. Portland Slavic Festival, 2015, 2016, 2017
  2. JAM Multicultural Festival, hosted by APANO Aug 2017
  3. Jim Pepper Festival 2015, 2016, 2017

Additionally, I am a 12+ year volunteer at the Waterfront Blues Festival, volunteering with KBOO on behalf of the Oregon Food Bank). This past year, as the beneficiary of the event changed I felt obliged to not participate.

On a more personal note, in a past life I was married to a local jazz musician, which exposed me to our local music scene. What struck me most during this time was how incredibly under appreciated world renowned artists were that lived here.  I’m proud that i had the pleasure to know Leroy Vinegar (Bassist), Janice Scroggins (pianist), Linda Hornbuckle (vocalist) who unfortunately have all passed. I’m a huge fan of live music and for fun make it a point to check out old friends like Nancy King, Norman Sylvester, Mel Brown and other local musicians.  In addition I have been a season seat holder at Portland Center Stage and attended the Montavilla Jazz Festival this year and was ask to provide a few words of welcome, which was an honor.

Because of these experiences, I support my friends on the PDX Jazz board who are working to make blues and jazz available to young children/students to pass on this important legacy so it doesn’t die with current musicians.  As President of the NAACP, I worked in coalition with our members and leaders to help create a Black Legacy Project event that highlighted and featured their creations for sale. We also provided awards to several artists in recognition of the challenges faced by artists in Portland such as high rent, dislocation, lack of visibility and marketing assistance.

 

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in Portland that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment.  How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Portland be doing to support this sector?

JAH: Artists and arts organizations are vital to a world class city.  Currently we spend 54% of flexible funding on policing services. I believe you know a lot about a city in how they spend discretionary funding.  There is an enormous inequity in how we invest in cultural programs. For example, the Rose Festival has a building on the waterfront for $1 a year yet most arts organizations led by people of color have to put on multi-day cultural festivals on with no assistance from the City of Portland.  I look forward to working with Commissioner Eudaly to ensure we are equitably investing in artists and arts organizations that represent the mosaic of talent in Portland.

 

RACC: The region’s affordability is a serious concern for everyone in our community. What are your plans for making housing and creative spaces more affordable for artists, nonprofit arts organizations and arts-related businesses?

Arts organizations, artists, and small business owners all are facing the repercussions of gentrification.  We must ensure we maintain affordable artist space and expand access throughout the city. We also need to work to ensure that those spaces remain affordable for the long term. I will work with my colleagues to ensure we don’t miss the opportunity to address this need as a priority along with housing.

 

RACC: The city’s Arts Tax is disliked by some, while 62% of voters approved it. Thanks to the Arts Tax, every K-5 student in the City of Portland now as an art, music or dance teacher, and dozens of nonprofit arts organizations are expanding access to the arts by providing free and low-cost arts experiences for Portland residents. What changes to the Arts Tax, if any, would you want Portland City Council to consider?

JAH: I’m very concern that some retires are exempt from paying this tax while persons with income at $10,000 are forced to pay this tax.  There are many low-income community members who are experiencing this regressive tax at a time they are challenged with keeping a roof over their head.  We must change state law to allow us to tax those who can most afford it. Having said that i look forward to auditing this process to ensure that those least able to pay for arts education are in fact the true beneficiaries of the funding.

 

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for the City of Portland that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

I believe in intersectionality and know that the artistic community, in addition to specific concerns, are also concerns with broad issues impacting our society at large. What I hear most often talking to community members, is fear of being priced out of the neighborhoods people are currently connected to and believe our housing crisis does touch all of us. Additionally, I am very motivated to help address climate change through the Portland Clean Energy Fund as well as ensuring our democracy by bringing campaign finance reform to the city with the implementation of campaign finance reforms hopefully approved by the voters this Fall.

Lastly, I am very interested in learning more from you on how you think the City Council can assist arts organizations and artists more effectively.  I need to hear directly from you, what is working, what are the challenges of your community and what solutions to you believe would address the issues most important to you.

 


Portland Auditor: Clearer Goals, Strong Leadership, Better Results

 

On May 22, 2018, RACC participated in a Portland City Council work session with Portland Auditor Mary Hull Caballero and her staff as they presented their findings from a 9-month performance audit of the organization.  This is the first ever audit of RACC, and was requested last summer by Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler and Commissioner Nick Fish. The audit presented an opportunity to examine the relationship between RACC and the City as we negotiate a new five-year service agreement with the City.

While the audit was intended to assess RACC’s performance, the report findings indicated the assessment was difficult because the City does not have clear goals for arts and culture. To improve arts and culture services, the audit suggests clarifying the City’s goals and RACC’s strategy to address these goals. As a result, the auditor delivered five specific recommendations as part of their report:

  1. The Arts Commissioner and the Mayor should work with the Arts Council, City leaders, City agencies involved with arts and- culture, and community stakeholders to: (a) Assess the state of arts and culture in Portland; (b) Identify needs; (c) Develop clear goals, vision, and strategy for arts and culture for City Council adoption.
  2. The Arts Council should conduct a strategic planning process to clarify the organization’s mission, goals and vision for arts and culture. Update bylaws to reflect governing agreements.
  3. City Council should review the intergovernmental agreement with the Arts Council, and in conjunction with other jurisdictions party to it, recommend changes that reflect the appropriate level of board representation and funding from each jurisdiction.
  4. The Arts Commissioner, Mayor, and the Arts Council’s Executive Director should update the contract, consistent with the City’s goals for arts and culture.
  5. The Arts Commissioner and Mayor should appoint a contract administration professional to: (a) Monitor compliance with the contract; (b) Provide technical assistance on performance measurement and reporting to the Arts Council; (c) Review the annual budget submitted by the Arts Council; (d) Develop a consistent mechanism to track all City funding to the Arts Council; (e) Develop procedures for the Art Council’s reporting so that there is consistency over time.

 

An important clarification:

One statistic reported by the Auditor has created confusion on City Council, and has been mischaracterized by the press. The auditor calculated RACC’s internal expenses, including “salaries, staff training and rent,” as 33% of our overall budget of $11.2 million, but failed to provide any context for that number, leaving the impression that RACC’s internal expenses are excessively high. Working with the auditor’s staff and perusing public records at https://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/72512 , we were able to determine that RACC’s “internal expenses” are, in fact, very low compared to the city’s own bureaus. Portland Parks and Recreation has internal expenses of 40%, the Water Bureau is 51%, Equity and Human Rights is 84%, the Auditor is 85% and Fire is 86% — just to name a few. We believe that internal investments, including personnel, are essential to move the city’s agenda forward, but it is important for people to understand that “internal expenses” are not the same as “management and overhead” expenses.

RACC’s independent financial audit confirms that 15% of our budget is spent on management, overhead and fundraising, while 85% of RACC’s budget goes toward program delivery. This includes RACC’s grant awards and public art commissions, of course, but also community engagement staff who actively connect people in underrepresented communities to our services and other arts experiences in town; arts education coaches who train classroom teachers to integrate the arts into their curriculum; and public art maintenance technicians who keep the city’s public art collection in tip-top shape.

 

Moving forward:

Notwithstanding the City Auditor’s misleading calculations, RACC supports the recommendations in the Auditor’s report. As reflected in interim executive director Jeff Hawthorne’s recent op-ed piece, we look forward to helping the City identify clear goals for arts and culture. In the meantime, RACC continues to strengthen our leadership role within the arts and culture arena.

  • RACC has awarded more than 5,000 grants totaling $44 million in the past 23 years.
  • Our nationally-recognized Public Art Program manages a widely-celebrated public art collection of more than 2,000 artworks for the City of Portland and Multnomah County, and grows artist capacity through programs and resources
  • Through our workplace giving campaigns, we have raised more than $8 million for local arts organizations
  • RACC organizes networking events, forums, and workshops for thousands of artists every year
  • Under our Arts Education programs, RACC builds capacity for teaching artists, educators, and curriculum developers to integrate arts into the K-8 subjects in the region, serving more than 27,000 students a year.
  • For the past three years, RACC has been keenly focused on identifying barriers in arts access and pathways to better serve underrepresented communities. Our 2015 Equity Statement articulates the organization’s equity philosophy and frames how we operate, and we have conducted focus groups to understand barriers to access. More recently, our 2017-18 Community Engagement Plan lays out our strategies to equitably expand outreach, collaboration, and resource distribution efforts. Additionally, we have been developing new programming that fills in gaps in arts participation by artists from marginalized communities, with our Art & Power conversation series as an example.

For more information on these and other RACC program accomplishments, visit RACC’s online annual report for 2017.

We look forward to collaborating with the Mayor, the Arts Commissioner and City staff to implement these recommendations and better support culture, creativity, innovation and the arts in our community.

 


Response: Philip Wolfe

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.  RACC will continue to publish responses from candidates even after the deadline has passed.

Here are the responses provided by Philip Wolfe, running for Portland City Council, Position 2. All responses are reprinted verbatim from what the candidate sent us on May 1. 

 


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in Portland?

PW: I am an artist. I draw, paint, soft pastel, make films, act, dance, photography and so on. I love art. Currently I am employed with Portland Art Museum on board with accessibility task force. I advise architects after viewing the first draft of their drawings on a new building they are planning on building about how to make it more accessible for all. I am so excited and proud to be on their board. I look forward to this project come in fruition.

 

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in Portland that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment.  How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Portland be doing to support this sector?

PW: Arts and culture is so important because it brings communities together as a part of education, entertainment and appreciation for art. Arts shall receive more funding, not the other way around. All schools shall have arts. Because Portland is the whitest city in the US, racism, sexism, classism, ableism and audism are running amok here in Portland, sadly. Arts and culture is one significant way of ending oppression. I have a big dream of forming a Deaf history month, hopefully next year at the Arts Museum. I basically grew up on stage and that experience made a profound impact on me. Without art, life has no meaning. Simple as that.

 

RACC: The region’s affordability is a serious concern for everyone in our community. What are your plans for making housing and creative spaces more affordable for artists, nonprofit arts organizations and arts-related businesses?

PW: Implement rent control. Tax large corporations. Affordable spaces for local businesses is important and needs support from our city as it promotes economic growth in our city.

 

RACC: The city’s Arts Tax is disliked by some, while 62% of voters approved it. Thanks to the Arts Tax, every K–5 student in the City of Portland now as an art, music or dance teacher, and dozens of nonprofit arts organizations are expanding access to the arts by providing free and low–cost arts experiences for Portland residents. What changes to the Arts Tax, if any, would you want Portland City Council to consider?

PW: I agree wholeheartedly that Art Tax is very important. City Council shall never remove this tax. I am thinking, why don’t we do more by taxing churches after all they are all about helping the poor? Churches lately feel entitled to discuss politics which shall be separate, while they are tax exempt.

 

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for the City of Portland that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

PW: I would host forums for all of them to have an opportunity to share ideas, concerns and needs. I will then bring their voices to our table with my team and come up with strategies how we can better support them. We need to stop buying developers from building more buildings and focus on priorities. We need to stop from freeways expanding and focus on other means of transportation, require all public buses go electric. We need to focus on filling the gaps in Portland to make it more accessible. I love the fact that Portland has many art festivals, however with renting space is very expensive. I think we should take a look at this and figure out how we can better support locals as surviving a new local business is brutal. I strongly object City wanting to take cannabis tax and invest in police.


Response: Greg Malinowski

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.  RACC will continue to publish responses from candidates even after the deadline has passed.

Here are the responses provided by Greg Malinowski, running for Washington County Commissioner, District 2. All responses are reprinted verbatim from what the candidates sent us on April 11.

 


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in Washington County?

GM: I have been a strong supporter of Washington County’s funding for the arts. Two years ago, RACC was provided with $115K, an additional $20K was given last year, and this year we hope to add another 10K. All of the recent increases were directed to Tualatin Valley Creates, which provides workshops for artists and helps connect them with grants and other opportunities. I was also a supporter of the Capital campaign through the county for Bag and Baggage’s new venue in Hillsboro.

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in Washington County that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment. How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Washington County be doing to support this sector?

GM: Art has the power to inspire individuals and our entire community. Research has clearly shown that children who have a strong arts education tend to do significantly better in other subjects, including science and math. There are real economic benefits too – a study published by the Regional Arts and Culture Council shows that the nonprofit arts and culture sector in the Greater Portland Area generates millions of dollars in economic activity and provides over 11,000 jobs. Yet at the same time, arts programs in most of our schools are severely underfunded, especially those in low-income communities. Artists are our innovators, and as we plan for the future of Washington County we need to make sure that opportunities for artists are not limited only to wealthy schools and neighborhoods. To create equitable access to the arts we will need to generate more funding locally because the legislature is unlikely to act on this anytime in the near future. With a new progressive county commission, I believe Washington County will be well-equipped to take on this challenge.

One approach would be to establish a small percentage, say at least 1% of capital cost in construction or reconstruction, to make sure that public projects dedicate some funding for art installations. Portland recently established a small Arts Tax to support art and music teachers in their schools, and with a more progressive county commission we may be able to refer a similar measure to the ballot. Washington County Kids, a local organization working to increase investment in afterschool programs, has proposed a special district for children’s services which could also be a way to support arts and music in low-income communities. This would also need to go to the ballot. I think the county can make substantial improvements in funding for local arts programs by implementing these kinds of policies.

RACC:  Washington County is currently moving forward with development of a $46 million events center at the Washington County Fairgrounds. Do you believe there is a place for the arts in future development of the fairgrounds site?

GM: Artists should absolutely be included in future development of the fairgrounds. We have incredible artistic talent in Washington County and the event center is an ideal place to highlight it. Our institutions should reflect our culture and diversity; local art can help us express this to fellow community members and visitors. That being said, most of the installations for the main plaza, formerly called the veterans plaza, have been cut because of budget constraints. This is one reason I like the idea of requiring 1% of construction costs on public projects to be dedicated for art projects. That way, if something has to be cut, art projects are not eliminated.
Washington County does not currently have a percent-for-art program. Would you support the development of a program to support more art at public facilities?

GM: A percent-for-art program would create more opportunities for artists to be a part of the legacy of Washington County. As noted above, I would be very supportive of this type of measure, especially if we could ensure that local art is prioritized.

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for Washington County that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

GM: Right now, we have 72,000 people who make $21 an hour or less and commute into Washington County for their jobs, and for many, this is simply because they cannot afford to live in the communities where they work. Teachers, including arts educators, understand this problem well. It is unacceptable that the people we trust with our children’s education are being priced out of the neighborhoods they nurture. Instead of building affordable housing on the edges of our county where the transportation infrastructure cannot sustain rapid growth, and farther from where most of our jobs are, I want to rezone old commercial lots for mixed residential-commercial use along major roads like TV Highway. If folks are closer to the heart of the county, it will be less difficult to connect them with public transportation and other neighborhood services. Allowing more residents to live closer to their workplaces means that they can spend less time on the road and more time creating a better life for themselves, their loved ones, and their communities.


Response: Shirley Craddick

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.  RACC will continue to publish responses from candidates even after the deadline has passed.

Here are the responses provided by Shirley Craddick, running for Metro Councilor, District 1. All responses are reprinted verbatim from what the candidates sent us on April 9.

 


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in the Portland metro region?

SC: Metro is very fortunate to have a close working relationship with the Regional Arts and Culture Council.  The organization has advised and helped Metro staff select public art for two projects at the Oregon Zoo, Elephants Lands and the Education facility.  The art is beautiful and contributes so much to the new elephant habitat and education facility.

In addition, RACC has worked with Metro staff helping recruit artists each year for the annual Glean program transforming trashed and neglected items found at Metro’s Central Transfer Station in north Portland into art.  Each year the items are displayed at a show at a local art studio.  Many items become permanent exhibits at Metro facilities.

 

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in our communities that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment.  How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Metro be doing to support this sector?

SC:

Housing:

We all know that when artists begin to rent space in a neighborhood the area is on its way to becoming gentrified.  Artists are the incubators helping languishing neighborhoods and business districts to becoming more desirable and successful.  On one side this is great news.  We want all neighborhoods to thrive, businesses to be successful and neighborhoods to be great places to live, but we also need to keep housing in a neighborhood affordable, so gentrification does not push the artists out.

Promoting:

Metro’s performing art facilities have the opportunity to promote local artists by displaying artist’s works and hosting art shows.  Multiple shows have occurred at various Metro facilities.  The performing art facilities have over 1 million people walk through their doors each year.

Engaging:

Metro supports young artists too.  Using Metro Paint (paint recycled at a Metro facility) young artists have painted murals at a variety of structures that often tagged with graffiti.

 

RACC: The region’s affordability is a serious concern for everyone in our community. What are your plans for making housing and creative spaces more affordable for artists, nonprofit arts organizations and arts-related businesses?

One way to support the art and culture community is to have adequate affordable housing.  The Metro Council is exploring this challenge and hosting discussions with the regional community to prepare a plan to ensure there is adequate affordable housing in the region.  We are considering asking the regional voters to support a bond measure that will allow housing to be built in all parts of the Portland metro region.

Another way to support the art community is to encourage cities to create more zoning for more live/work buildings to be constructed or renovated.  Allowing artists to live in their studios can be a significant savings.

 

RACC: How can RACC and Metro do a better job of providing arts experiences for underrepresented populations, including rural communities, people of color, people with disabilities and underserved neighborhoods?

SC: Annually Metro’s Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall hosts performances for the Portland metro area Title 1 schools.  The goal is to introduce young people, who might not have the opportunity, to be able to attend an artist performance.  The Black Violin duo, Wil Bapiste and Kevin Sylvester, have performed the last two years for these young audiences.  The two are classical violinist who perform Hip Hop.  It is moving to see the young people respond to their performance.  The children stand or dance in the aisles for almost the entire performance.  This is a commitment that Metro has to help young people of our region.  In addition, the Black Violin is accompanied by a youth orchestra.

In addition, Metro’s Portland’5 provides free tickets and bus passes to students and teachers in Title 1 schools for performances that interest children, such as “Billy Elliot, The Musical.”  Invitations also go out to Job Corp enrollees and Urban League families.

 

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for Metro that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

SC: Metro’s Park and Nature departments is beginning to contemplate how more nature-based art programs can be incorporated into the work that Metro does in our natural areas.


Response: Lynn Peterson

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.  RACC will continue to publish responses from candidates even after the deadline has passed.

Here are the responses provided by Lynn Peterson, running for Metro Council President. All responses are reprinted verbatim from what the candidates sent us.

  


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in the Portland metro region?

LP: I have been a big supporter of the arts in my elected official capacity for Lake Oswego and Clackamas County. In these positions I worked to set aside money for major art projects, and I understand that the creative sector is an important component of our economy.

 

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in our communities that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment.  How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Metro be doing to support this sector?

LP: Metro’s role is to think about the bigger picture, invest in the right systems and infrastructure, and help provide options for our residents to lead healthy and productive lives. This is as true for the arts as it is for transportation, housing, or parks. The arts bring us together throughout the region, both in local communities and at our major venues, to share experiences, connect with each other and the world, and challenge ourselves and our assumptions. I do not see this as a zero sum equation between competing needs. I have spent my entire career building complete communities, which include a good job and affordable living, a clean environment and connection to nature, and vibrant communities that feed the spirit. The arts are part of a complete community.

That’s why I will be pleased to lead the agency that is responsible for the Portland 5 venues in downtown Portland. These gathering points anchor our downtown, contribute to our regional economy, attract tourism, and support our local artists. The Portland 5 facilities are all well run, but we need a regional conversation about how to invest in them for the future.

Recently, Metro has launched the Placemaking Grant program, bringing artists into the mix as part of our regional planning and development work. I love seeing these projects as we create a future with local communities in places like the Jade District and downtown Oregon City.  These grants are a great resource to support the local economy, and an important way to support culturally specific art and communities. This is a part of a larger affordability issue, which is a cornerstone of the work I would like to carry out at Metro.

 

RACC: The region’s affordability is a serious concern for everyone in our community. What are your plans for making housing and creative spaces more affordable for artists, nonprofit arts organizations and arts-related businesses?

LP: Artists and creative ventures are suffering from some of the same issues as homeowners, renters, and local businesses. Our region has not prepared sufficient land for development, and prices everywhere have gone up. We have plenty of available land for all of these needs, but it is not located in complete communities with access to transit, commerce, and core services. This is especially important for artists and arts organizations that need to operate from within communities. We can do better.

As Metro President, I will pursue plans for land acquisition that allow local jurisdictions to write down value for affordable housing, local business, and the arts–especially close to transit access. Metro has considerable experience land banking for natural areas, and can apply this experience to housing and development needs and in transit oriented development, the single most equitable form of transit/affordable housing provision. I support Metro’s current plans for a housing bond measure, and would link further investments to future transportation investments. We also can work with market-based institutions and foundations to bring new capital to invest in affordable options.

Metro should also be working to avoid this type of crisis in the future by better establishing and forecasting community needs for every jurisdiction within Metro by housing types based on different economic scenarios. We need to recognize the different types of housing at all levels of income that our region needs. Additionally, there is a need for low-income stabilization so fewer people fall into homelessness.

 

RACC: How can RACC and Metro do a better job of providing arts experiences for underrepresented populations, including rural communities, people of color, people with disabilities and underserved neighborhoods?

LP: One of Metro’s most successful initiatives is the Nature in Neighborhoods grant program, run through the Parks and Nature department and supported by voter-approved measures. These grants go out to community groups to connect people to nature, with a specific focus on equity outcomes. I believe we can better integrate the arts into these efforts, both in terms of capital investments and programs in our natural areas. I also think we can replicate this model in housing, solid waste, and transportation, integrating art with these strategies to build complete communities throughout our region.

We also need to do a better job communicating our vision for the future to new generations of people in the region, both those growing up in our schools and neighborhoods, and those arriving from other states and countries. We need to partner with local organizations to understand today’s issues and challenges, and connect them with the enduring values of this region. There is a limit to what can be done with policy papers and powerpoint. We need to partner with RACC and our creative community to find new and exciting ways to imagine our future.

My commitment to communities across this region that do not feel like they have a voice is to actually provide a seat at the table. This will occur in different ways depending on the type of decision and the community. These communities should feel more connected through time as Metro works to hire a more diverse workforce that will have input on ways to be effective with different populations. Metro should also work to diversify procurement and minority contracting goals.

 

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for Metro that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

LP: Our region is growing by some 90 people per day, with lots of resulting challenges for housing, transportation, and economic opportunity. I believe that we need to make major investments along our regional lifelines–e.g. Powell, TV Highway, Barbur Boulevard–to create the complete neighborhoods we need. We can transform these places into centers for the arts, business, and vibrant communities.

We have worked hard to make this region a great place to live, and we didn’t do it so that it could become a gated community for the privileged. Now is the time to make major investments so that there is room for all kinds of people. We need to reduce congestion and provide transportation options. We need all types of housing. Everyone should have safe sidewalks and access to nature. I invite RACC and our region’s artists to help me imagine and convey what this kind of future will look like and how it will feel for the people who live here.


Response: Kimberly Culbertson

For the spring 2018 primary election, RACC distributed a questionnaire to all candidates running for Portland City Council; Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington County Boards of Commissioners; and Metro Council. Each candidate was asked five questions on March 13 or 14, and given the opportunity to respond by March 30 when this story was first published.  RACC will continue to publish responses from candidates even after the deadline has passed.

Here are the responses provided by Kimberly Culbertson, running for Washington County Commissioner, District 4. All responses are reprinted verbatim from what the candidates sent us.

  


 

RACC: In what specific ways have you supported arts and culture in Washington County?

KC: I frequently buy art from local artists, support our local theatrical companies and contribute to the Oregon Cultural Trust.  I have not been an elected official, nor am I a person of wealth, so I advocate for the arts in my capacity on the Design Committee for the Hillsboro Downtown Association and the Urban Renewal Advisory Committee. I also have advocated for arts to be a stronger element in the redesign of the Hillsboro Airport, as I am on the HIO Master Plan Advisory Committee. I supported the renovation of the Venetian Theater as well as the development of Sequoia Gallery and The Vault, home of the Bag & Baggage Theatre Company.  Moreover, I would promote a public drive to pay off the City loan on The Vault building, so that theatre can be created without the hindrance of a large mortgage.

 

RACC: Artists and arts organizations add measurable value to our region’s economy, our education system and our quality of life. Yet there are a number of pressing needs in Washington County that often compete with arts and culture for attention and investment. How would YOU describe the importance of arts and culture in our community, and what should Washington County be doing to support this sector?

KC: Arts and culture are exceptionally important for our community because it is one of the drivers of our economy and defines our quality of life in Washington County. Our growing creative class can spur innovation across other fields.

For many years, the focal point of arts experiences has been in the urban core of Portland, and our colleagues at Multnomah County continue to lead the state in their forwarding thinking and planning related to arts infrastructure. Of particular concern, throughout the region, is the decline in affordable performance spaces. As Portland “feels the squeeze” of ever growing property values and high rents, many arts organizations have found themselves priced out of the city. Washington County, too, has challenges related to available performance and creative spaces. Over time, artists and organizations in the Portland area will naturally begin to look outside of their city for more affordable spaces to create their work. Washington County has an opportunity to plan, support, and incentivize the formulation of such spaces, and should position itself as a welcoming, affordable destination for these creative entrepreneurs.

It is important that we magnify this valuable sector. Washington County Commission can act as a megaphone to support creative people and organizations, just as we do manufacturing and technology.  We can work with the many large companies in Washington County to partner in projects that promote arts infrastructure and capacity building, and in neighboring school districts and neighborhoods, we can design elements that enhance the aesthetics of our public buildings. We can also promote more collaboration with the arts community in our public spaces. Finally, as we lessen our deficit of affordable housing, our most pressing need, we should ensure that we are developing solutions for members of the creative class who are priced out of many of our communities. Helping artists and makers have the ability to live and work in our county will not only help to develop a rich and vibrant culture, but will also help us promote and grow these small businesses, bringing new revenue and jobs to the County.

 

RACC: Washington County is currently moving forward with development of a $46 million events center at the Washington County Fairgrounds. Do you believe there is a place for the arts in future development of the fairgrounds site?

KC: Yes, the fairground Events Center should be an important element for promoting arts and culture in our community. The Events Center, as well as any future development, should take every opportunity to grow our creative community and facilitate spaces where people from all over the county can come together and create.  Creativity does not preclude agricultural events, and I would advocate for the arts being showcased at our County Fair, an event that brought in 103,625 attendees in 2016.

 

RACC: Washington County does not currently have a percent-for-art program. Would you support the development of a program to support more art at public facilities?

KC: Yes, I would support a percent-for-art program as adding art into our public spaces brings a great value to our quality of life in Washington County. It also provides us a great opportunity to partner with our local schools and universities to showcase some of the amazing talents of our younger people. Public buildings should be gathering places and the arts can help to convene those gatherings. Percent For Art programs have been hugely successful across the nation in helping to create connection and community. The research is clear; public art lowers barriers to access to arts experiences for all residents. It can help create a unique sense of place, improve the overall quality of life, generate economic impact from cultural tourism, and bring together diverse groups of people for shared experiences.

 

RACC: What are some of your other priorities for Washington County that would be of interest to artists, arts organizations and arts educators in our community?

KC: I would like to see more local artists, designers and actors featured in the many film productions we foster in Washington County.  Large production companies like Laika, headquartered in Hillsboro, can reach out to our communities to showcase their work and draw from the creativity our diverse county has.  In my capacity as Commissioner, I would promote the arts in all aspects of our infrastructure and public works. I would also promote publicly showing  the many corporate collections of art held here. Arts Learning and Education is also key; throughout Washington County, the arts have consistently been a target for cuts in school district budgets. As a result, many of our most vulnerable youth are attending schools without the benefit of exposure to the arts. I am a strong and dedicated advocate for the STEAM approach, which includes the arts as a key part of the focus on building the next generation of professionals and places arts as of equal value to science, technology, engineering, and math.